Some have gone as far as to describe the film as a sort of Rorschach test. I think that’s a bit cynical. I would say that it is a work of art. Were not used to viewing art in American society. We like our information predigisted. When faced with art which must be interpreted some people seem perplexed.

Of course the most ridiculous have been some conservative critics who have bashed the film for being too liberal without taking the time to examine the good old fashioned conservative principles that are embraced by the film as well.

I really enjoyed your review as well. The analysis of the movie as a post-Communist manifesto is really thought provoking.

I picked up on some of the biblical references in WALL•E, and even have a brief line in my review about WALL•E being a “savior”. But it was only after I finished writing my review and did some more exploring on the net that it ocurred to me that WALL•E could have been intended as a Christian allegory.

This is reinforced by some comments from the creator/director, Andrew Stanton, in this interview.
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/14127

STANTON: Well, what really interested me was the idea of the most human thing in the universe being a machine because it has more interest in finding out what the point of living is than actual people. The greatest commandment Christ gives us is to love, but that’s not always our priority. So I came up with this premise that could demonstrate what I was trying to say—that irrational love defeats the world’s programming. You’ve got these two robots that are trying to go above their basest directives, literally their programming, to experience love.