
Update: Apparently, Perez Hilton did call the cops before he started Tweeting. Still, was Tweeting necessary?
If you had just been the victim of a crime, would you call the police before or after you Twittered about it? And if someone had accused you of a crime—of a crime that could result in jail time—would you respond via your attorney or via internet video?
I ask because Perez Hilton claims he was assaulted by will.i.am of The Black Eyed Peas, and will.i.am denies it… and both of them have taken to the internet to hash it out.
After allegedly being assaulted at an after-party in Canada, Hilton tweeted to his readers to call the cops. Since then, will.i.am has posted multiple videos claiming innocence.
And look… if I had just been attacked by someone famous, I might feel the impulse to instantly to make it public, as a way of getting revenge via bad publicity. And as Chris Brown and others have shown, for celebs accused of something illegal, homemade “innocence videos” are becoming this year’s defensive talk show tour.
Furthermore, I know this incident is just the latest in a century-long string of “court of public opinion” flare-ups.
And yet despite all the precedent, this is still unsettling.
For one thing, if a purported victim asks his Twitter followers to call the cops for him, isn’t it harder to take his assault claim seriously? No matter what happened, Hilton has already worked the incident to his own advantage, which suggests he’s more interested in getting attention than telling the truth.
And as for will.i.am… why should he lower himself to Hilton’s level of exploitation? If the charges are serious, then they need to be addressed through proper legal channels. If they aren’t, then they shouldn’t be honored with quickie online videos.Â
I don’t have all the facts. I wasn’t there. But based on what’s being presented about this alleged kerfuffle, it seems like two people who are desperate for publicity have tacitly agreed to turn the idea of assault into a viral internet sensation. Once again, real crime has been transformed into cheap entertainment.Â
What do you guys think? Â
(photo via Towleroad)






7 responses so far ↓
1 Jthan // Jun 22, 2009 at 8:39 am
Perez is a chronic fame whore.
2 Roommate Joe // Jun 22, 2009 at 9:16 am
But he’s a chronic fame whore who I completely believe would get beaten up by one of the celebrities he “covers.” And that the first place he’d go after a real assault would be Twitter. Doesn’t make him any less attacked (allegedly), much as I may dislike him.
3 Echomusic // Jun 22, 2009 at 10:14 am
Why WOULDN’T you want to assault Perez Hilton?
4 Deanna // Jun 22, 2009 at 12:35 pm
Perez Hilton=Twat
5 ferretrick // Jun 22, 2009 at 1:48 pm
I agree if Perez was assaulted, that is criminal behavior and will.i.am should be arrested and prosecuted (and get a real name). But, it does erode my sympathy a bit when the victim seems to be exploiting their victimhood for personal gain.
Perez, honey, we have this thing called 9-1-1. Look into it. And shut up.
6 Emily WK // Jun 22, 2009 at 10:15 pm
I have heard from other sources that Perez called will.i.am a “fucking faggot” for the purposes of inciting him and infuriating him.
Not that he got what he deserved – by no means do any words warrant that kind of violence.
But Perez lost any sympathy from me once I found that out.
7 InfoMofo // Jun 23, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I don’t really fault will.i.am for responding in the court of public opinion- he is an entertainer whose reputation can affect his livelihood. We live in a society where silence is often assumed to be guilt.
Leave a Comment