<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;True Blood&#8221; Sucker Punch: Episode 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/</link>
	<description>Awesome Reviews of Movies, Music, and TV</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:11:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6053</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6053</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note:  Checked in with my ex (my do-to gal on Charlayne Harris novels, which she says are formulaic but go down easy): apparently in the novels, Sookie does go undercover among the sun church people and get caught--and that&#039;s the MAIN story regarding them.  In the novels, Jason doesn&#039;t convert or get involved with them in any way, and Sarah is a leader of the group but has no scenes and is not explored as a character.  For me, this supports my guess that the exploration of the inner workings of the faithful in the TV series is Alan Ball&#039;s take on the issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note:  Checked in with my ex (my do-to gal on Charlayne Harris novels, which she says are formulaic but go down easy): apparently in the novels, Sookie does go undercover among the sun church people and get caught&#8211;and that&#8217;s the MAIN story regarding them.  In the novels, Jason doesn&#8217;t convert or get involved with them in any way, and Sarah is a leader of the group but has no scenes and is not explored as a character.  For me, this supports my guess that the exploration of the inner workings of the faithful in the TV series is Alan Ball&#8217;s take on the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6052</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6052</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have you know that every week as the credits roll on True Blood I can&#039;t help but think &quot;oh man, what will this week&#039;s Sucker Punch be?&quot;...thanks for adding entertainment value to this already thrilling show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have you know that every week as the credits roll on True Blood I can&#8217;t help but think &#8220;oh man, what will this week&#8217;s Sucker Punch be?&#8221;&#8230;thanks for adding entertainment value to this already thrilling show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InfoMofo</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6045</link>
		<dc:creator>InfoMofo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6045</guid>
		<description>Ah I have stopped analyzing this show and apologizing to my friends for watching it and now I just sit agape at my TV, occasionally stopping to howl with laughter.

Things that elicited howls:
1) &quot;sex with a vampire dude! That would be the cream dey la cream!&quot;
2) Almost anything that the preacher dude says.  He&#039;s great.
3) Vampire Bill&#039;s french accent is about as convincing as his southern accent.
4) Hoyt.  SIIIIGHH.
5) The use of &quot;hard-hearted hannah&quot;, both in the awesomely cheesy parlor scene, and over the end credits.  This show is right up there with weeds for old-timey credit music use.  Plus the song has a &quot;vamp&quot; pun in it.  And I&#039;ve liked that song ever since Nikki McKibbin sang it in Season One of AI.  C&#039;mon you loved it too.
6) Bill puts the necklace on his girlfriend!  Squee!

You have to love a show if the most boring moment is a giant drum circle orgy in a field (just kidding, of course the most boring scene was the awful pool table pillow talk, ugh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I have stopped analyzing this show and apologizing to my friends for watching it and now I just sit agape at my TV, occasionally stopping to howl with laughter.</p>
<p>Things that elicited howls:<br />
1) &#8220;sex with a vampire dude! That would be the cream dey la cream!&#8221;<br />
2) Almost anything that the preacher dude says.  He&#8217;s great.<br />
3) Vampire Bill&#8217;s french accent is about as convincing as his southern accent.<br />
4) Hoyt.  SIIIIGHH.<br />
5) The use of &#8220;hard-hearted hannah&#8221;, both in the awesomely cheesy parlor scene, and over the end credits.  This show is right up there with weeds for old-timey credit music use.  Plus the song has a &#8220;vamp&#8221; pun in it.  And I&#8217;ve liked that song ever since Nikki McKibbin sang it in Season One of AI.  C&#8217;mon you loved it too.<br />
6) Bill puts the necklace on his girlfriend!  Squee!</p>
<p>You have to love a show if the most boring moment is a giant drum circle orgy in a field (just kidding, of course the most boring scene was the awful pool table pillow talk, ugh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6044</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6044</guid>
		<description>Mark:  To temper the extremity that comes with trying to say it all in one screen--Jessica&#039;s story is the exception to my sweeping condemnation (I think the actress is a sensational find), and the growth of another character or two around her follows on.  And this last episode did suggest (for the first time, for me) that Lafayette&#039;s psychic wounds from being tortured are going to be taken seriously--and it also opened the character of whatsisname the PTSD short-order cook for a moment.  And they&#039;re suggesting some inner struggles in Eric, although they haven&#039;t delivered much yet.  

But I do maintain that these are momentary diversions in a season whose primary energies are manifestly elsewhere.  Tara in particular has lost so much dimension that she&#039;s just another pretty soap-opera heroine (nominally spunky division) in an ominous situation, and Sookie (essentially a happy newlywed) is simply boring me.  

As for Sarah--I&#039;m sorry, I don&#039;t see it; I think they&#039;re making fun of her every step of the way.  (You say sexually conflicted?  Where&#039;s the inner conflict, except in her situation, to which she responds with wide-eyed hypocrisy?  She evidences no guilt--she pouts about how her husband is treating her,  follows her hormones, and hasn&#039;t uttered a syllable about the moral inconsistency of being an adulterous Christian leader, or bulldozing over Jason&#039;s objections, endangering his soul and hers.  (Again, I don&#039;t think Ball-et-al have a clue , or give a rap, about how sincere Christians, especially conflicted ones, might actually think.)  I think, if I may say it, that the kindness of your empathetic response to her is more about you (and positive, of course) than about how she&#039;s being written.  You may care about Sarah; I don&#039;t think the writers do at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark:  To temper the extremity that comes with trying to say it all in one screen&#8211;Jessica&#8217;s story is the exception to my sweeping condemnation (I think the actress is a sensational find), and the growth of another character or two around her follows on.  And this last episode did suggest (for the first time, for me) that Lafayette&#8217;s psychic wounds from being tortured are going to be taken seriously&#8211;and it also opened the character of whatsisname the PTSD short-order cook for a moment.  And they&#8217;re suggesting some inner struggles in Eric, although they haven&#8217;t delivered much yet.  </p>
<p>But I do maintain that these are momentary diversions in a season whose primary energies are manifestly elsewhere.  Tara in particular has lost so much dimension that she&#8217;s just another pretty soap-opera heroine (nominally spunky division) in an ominous situation, and Sookie (essentially a happy newlywed) is simply boring me.  </p>
<p>As for Sarah&#8211;I&#8217;m sorry, I don&#8217;t see it; I think they&#8217;re making fun of her every step of the way.  (You say sexually conflicted?  Where&#8217;s the inner conflict, except in her situation, to which she responds with wide-eyed hypocrisy?  She evidences no guilt&#8211;she pouts about how her husband is treating her,  follows her hormones, and hasn&#8217;t uttered a syllable about the moral inconsistency of being an adulterous Christian leader, or bulldozing over Jason&#8217;s objections, endangering his soul and hers.  (Again, I don&#8217;t think Ball-et-al have a clue , or give a rap, about how sincere Christians, especially conflicted ones, might actually think.)  I think, if I may say it, that the kindness of your empathetic response to her is more about you (and positive, of course) than about how she&#8217;s being written.  You may care about Sarah; I don&#8217;t think the writers do at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Blankenship</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6041</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Blankenship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6041</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wholly disagree with you about the Fellowship of the Sun characters, Michael, though I do think Sarah, with her vampiric past and conflicted sexual desires is more than a cliche.

But elsewhere in the season, I feel like there are several instances of nuanced character development. The Jessica-Bill relationship, for instance, has the texture of real child-parent conflict: Bill made Jessica, obsessively guards her, worries that she&#039;ll hurt herself and others, and slowly accepts her burgeoning identity. Meanwhile, Jessica is moving into post-adolescent freedom and responsibility with a compelling mixture of hesitancy and excitement. 

Also, and a reader pointed some of this out to me in a private e-mail, there&#039;s a lot of interesting stuff happening with Lafayette, who has spent this season being forced to recalibrate his entire personality. It&#039;s too early in the season to know where that will lead us, but he&#039;s already grappling with demons that are rooted in much more than flashy plot developments. Essentially, he developed his pround-and-fierce gay persona to make himself bulletproof in a small southern town, and now that persona is the very thing that has hurt him. What&#039;s he supposed to do now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wholly disagree with you about the Fellowship of the Sun characters, Michael, though I do think Sarah, with her vampiric past and conflicted sexual desires is more than a cliche.</p>
<p>But elsewhere in the season, I feel like there are several instances of nuanced character development. The Jessica-Bill relationship, for instance, has the texture of real child-parent conflict: Bill made Jessica, obsessively guards her, worries that she&#8217;ll hurt herself and others, and slowly accepts her burgeoning identity. Meanwhile, Jessica is moving into post-adolescent freedom and responsibility with a compelling mixture of hesitancy and excitement. </p>
<p>Also, and a reader pointed some of this out to me in a private e-mail, there&#8217;s a lot of interesting stuff happening with Lafayette, who has spent this season being forced to recalibrate his entire personality. It&#8217;s too early in the season to know where that will lead us, but he&#8217;s already grappling with demons that are rooted in much more than flashy plot developments. Essentially, he developed his pround-and-fierce gay persona to make himself bulletproof in a small southern town, and now that persona is the very thing that has hurt him. What&#8217;s he supposed to do now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6040</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 22:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6040</guid>
		<description>@Laura Mc:  My only point about the treatment of the &quot;sun people&quot; (or whatever they call themselves) is that it&#039;s a pileup of lefty cliches about conservative Christians: they&#039;re all dumb, superficially polished hicks, smiling for the telethon, but either idiotically sincere and led by the nose by vicious pastors ,or secretly hostile, gun-loving, and stupidly slutty.  Since--let&#039;s get real here--Ball, a gay boy from Marietta, is getting back at big-media-church homophobia, he&#039;s touching on real issues, and, while I understand the fun of mercilessly caricaturing your opponents, it&#039;s, to my mind, shallow and cheap stereotyping.  We all know these jokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Laura Mc:  My only point about the treatment of the &#8220;sun people&#8221; (or whatever they call themselves) is that it&#8217;s a pileup of lefty cliches about conservative Christians: they&#8217;re all dumb, superficially polished hicks, smiling for the telethon, but either idiotically sincere and led by the nose by vicious pastors ,or secretly hostile, gun-loving, and stupidly slutty.  Since&#8211;let&#8217;s get real here&#8211;Ball, a gay boy from Marietta, is getting back at big-media-church homophobia, he&#8217;s touching on real issues, and, while I understand the fun of mercilessly caricaturing your opponents, it&#8217;s, to my mind, shallow and cheap stereotyping.  We all know these jokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Mc.</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6037</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Mc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6037</guid>
		<description>Coding issues.. I ended that post with the word SHIVERS surrounded by these:  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coding issues.. I ended that post with the word SHIVERS surrounded by these:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Mc.</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6036</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Mc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6036</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s gonna happen to Sookie and Sam?! Very on edge regarding their impending traumas..

@ Michael: You really think Ball et al miss the satirical mark with the sun people? How could they improve? I guess I struggle with that question as well, suggesting there is not as much of a foundation as with other plot lines.. 

I miss Tara&#039;s mother. Is it just me, or was she like beyond excellent? I occassionally mistake melodramatic for crafted, so I am interested to hear thoughts. 

And a little moment, which was excellent and makes me glad some actors have trained quite well for their careers: LOVED when Daphne&#039;s face and voice changed with her evil reveal. &quot;Not this time, Sam.&quot; &lt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s gonna happen to Sookie and Sam?! Very on edge regarding their impending traumas..</p>
<p>@ Michael: You really think Ball et al miss the satirical mark with the sun people? How could they improve? I guess I struggle with that question as well, suggesting there is not as much of a foundation as with other plot lines.. </p>
<p>I miss Tara&#8217;s mother. Is it just me, or was she like beyond excellent? I occassionally mistake melodramatic for crafted, so I am interested to hear thoughts. </p>
<p>And a little moment, which was excellent and makes me glad some actors have trained quite well for their careers: LOVED when Daphne&#8217;s face and voice changed with her evil reveal. &#8220;Not this time, Sam.&#8221; &lt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6032</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6032</guid>
		<description>It was a SPECTACULARLY constructed episode; it was raining peripeteia, as we always say in the dramaturg biz. But I still maintain that, compared with last season, this season&#039;s about plot and shock--manipulated suspense and eye-popping events, sans character development (which was the distinction in Season One). Admittedly, Jessica we&#039;ve seen more dimensions of. And others here&#039;n&#039;there. But Tara&#039;s relationship with her mother last season was Proust compared to this, and her mother&#039;s exorcism got to psychological truth. That, it seems to me, is gone. Maryann is a dishonest soap cliche in my book (make orgiastic sex evil, but show lots and lots of abs). And Alan Ball (and company) can&#039;t imagine the mind of a conservative--obviously, the Church of the Sun is a parody of gay-baiting ministries, and there&#039;s a cathartic function to full-out mockery of your enemies, I suppose, but this smug cartooniness seems juvenile to me. The actors are spectacular; the aesthetic goals have slipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a SPECTACULARLY constructed episode; it was raining peripeteia, as we always say in the dramaturg biz. But I still maintain that, compared with last season, this season&#8217;s about plot and shock&#8211;manipulated suspense and eye-popping events, sans character development (which was the distinction in Season One). Admittedly, Jessica we&#8217;ve seen more dimensions of. And others here&#8217;n'there. But Tara&#8217;s relationship with her mother last season was Proust compared to this, and her mother&#8217;s exorcism got to psychological truth. That, it seems to me, is gone. Maryann is a dishonest soap cliche in my book (make orgiastic sex evil, but show lots and lots of abs). And Alan Ball (and company) can&#8217;t imagine the mind of a conservative&#8211;obviously, the Church of the Sun is a parody of gay-baiting ministries, and there&#8217;s a cathartic function to full-out mockery of your enemies, I suppose, but this smug cartooniness seems juvenile to me. The actors are spectacular; the aesthetic goals have slipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/2009/07/27/tb6/comment-page-1/#comment-6031</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecriticalcondition.com/?p=1926#comment-6031</guid>
		<description>The gaudiest moment of this week&#039;s episode was Bill and Lorena&#039;s slaughter/ sexfest....really? Ewwww...I just didn&#039;t need to see that but, it did foreshadow what a hunky dory person she is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The gaudiest moment of this week&#8217;s episode was Bill and Lorena&#8217;s slaughter/ sexfest&#8230;.really? Ewwww&#8230;I just didn&#8217;t need to see that but, it did foreshadow what a hunky dory person she is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

